Quantcast

MADISON - ST. CLAIR RECORD

Sunday, May 5, 2024

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois: Actions Taken on June 25

Filings
General court 09

shutterstock.com

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois reported the following activity on June 25 in the suits below:

In Donald G Cofer against Commissioner of Social Security:

'Complaint Against Commissioner Of Social Security, Filed By Donald G Cofer. (attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons Commissioner Of Social Security)(severs, Traci)'

'Notice Of Appearance By Traci L. Severs On Behalf Of Donald G Cofer (severs, Traci)'

'First Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Donald G Cofer. (severs, Traci)'

Case number 3:20-cv-00616 was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

In Dujuan Jackson against Commissioner of Social Security:

'Complaint Against Commissioner Of Social Security, Filed By Dujuan Jackson. (attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(gaines, Brent)'

'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Dujuan Jackson. (gaines, Brent)'

'Notice Of Appearance By Brent M. Gaines On Behalf Of Dujuan Jackson (gaines, Brent)'

Case number 3:20-cv-00614 was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

In Charles Kucinsky against Jane Does, John Does, Lorie Cunningham, Nurse Kurmicle, Nurse Schaffer and Wexford Health Source Inc. :

'Complaint Against All Defendants, Filed By Charles Kucinsky.(jsm2)'

'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Charles Kucinsky. (jsm2)'

'Motion For Recruitment Of Counsel By Charles Kucinsky. (attachments: # 1 Exhibits).(jsm2)'

'Notice And Order: The Court Has Received Your Complaint And Your Motion To Proceed Without Prepayment Of The Filing Fee. Your Case Number Is 20-cv-617-njr. The Following Is Some Information You Should Know Regarding The Initial Stages Of Your Lawsuit. After Your Filing Fee Status Is Determined, The Court Will Review Your Complaint To Identify Legally Sufficient Claims And Defendants And Dismiss Any Legally Insufficient Claims. See: 28 U.s.c. Sec. 1915a. The Court Will Conduct This Review Within The Next 60 Days And Inform You Of The Findings In A Merit Review Order. No Other Action Will Be Taken In Your Case During This Time, Absent Extraordinary Circumstances. Therefore, You Do Not Need To Submit Any Evidence, Argument, Motions, Or Other Documents. If You Filed A Motion For Recruitment Of Counsel Along With Your Complaint, It Will Not Be Considered Until The Merit Review Is Complete. Please Note That Any Motion For Recruitment Of Counsel Must Include Evidence Of Your Own Efforts To Find Counsel, Such As A List Of The Attorneys You Contacted And Copies Of Letters You Sent Or Received. See Pruitt V. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If You Do Not Receive A Merit Review Order Within The Next 60 Days, You May File A Motion Requesting The Status Of Your Case. In The Event Your Claim(s) Survive The Merit Review, Further Information And Instruction Will Be Provided To You At That Time. In Addition, Several Administrative Matters Warrant Mention. Any Communication Directed To The Court Should Be In The Form Of A Motion Or Other Pleading And Not A Letter. All Mail Should Be Sent To: Clerk's Office, U.s. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Il 62201. Finally, You Are Advised That If Your Address Changes, You Must Notify The Court Within Seven Days Of The Change By Filing A Notice Of Change Of Address. Failure To Do So Could Result In The Dismissal Of Your Case. Signed By Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel On 6/25/2020. (jsm2)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'

'Notice From Clerk Instructing Plaintiff To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Plaintiff On 06/25/2020. Consent Due By 7/16/2020. (jsm2)'

Case number 3:20-cv-00617-NJR was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

In Nathan Cobs against Amy Ruc, Brokes, C / O Rufferford, Deanna M. Brookhart, Joshua Crawford, Laura Cunningham, Nurse Kurmickal, Rob Jefreys, Stover and Wexford:

'Complaint Against All Defendants, Filed By Nathan Cobbs.(jsm2)'

'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Nathan Cobbs. (jsm2)'

'Motion For Recruitment Of Counsel By Nathan Cobbs. (jsm2)'

'Notice And Order: The Court Has Received Your Complaint And Your Motion To Proceed Without Prepayment Of The Filing Fee. Your Case Number Is 20-cv-618-smy. The Following Is Some Information You Should Know Regarding The Initial Stages Of Your Lawsuit. After Your Filing Fee Status Is Determined, The Court Will Review Your Complaint To Identify Legally Sufficient Claims And Defendants And Dismiss Any Legally Insufficient Claims. See: 28 U.s.c. Sec. 1915a. The Court Will Conduct This Review Within The Next 60 Days And Inform You Of The Findings In A Merit Review Order. No Other Action Will Be Taken In Your Case During This Time, Absent Extraordinary Circumstances. Therefore, You Do Not Need To Submit Any Evidence, Argument, Motions, Or Other Documents. If You Filed A Motion For Recruitment Of Counsel Along With Your Complaint, It Will Not Be Considered Until The Merit Review Is Complete. Please Note That Any Motion For Recruitment Of Counsel Must Include Evidence Of Your Own Efforts To Find Counsel, Such As A List Of The Attorneys You Contacted And Copies Of Letters You Sent Or Received. See Pruitt V. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If You Do Not Receive A Merit Review Order Within The Next 60 Days, You May File A Motion Requesting The Status Of Your Case. In The Event Your Claim(s) Survive The Merit Review, Further Information And Instruction Will Be Provided To You At That Time. In Addition, Several Administrative Matters Warrant Mention. Any Communication Directed To The Court Should Be In The Form Of A Motion Or Other Pleading And Not A Letter. All Mail Should Be Sent To: Clerk's Office, U.s. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Il 62201. Finally, You Are Advised That If Your Address Changes, You Must Notify The Court Within Seven Days Of The Change By Filing A Notice Of Change Of Address. Failure To Do So Could Result In The Dismissal Of Your Case. Signed By Judge Staci M. Yandle On 6/25/2020. (jsm2)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'

'Notice From Clerk Instructing Plaintiff To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Plaintiff On 06/25/2020. Consent Due By 7/16/2020. (jsm2)'

Case number 3:20-cv-00618-SMY was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

In Jesie Hoper against Dan Sproul and Inmate Lamere: 'Order: Plaintiff Has Filed A Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("ifp") In This Case (see Doc. 2 ), But Has Failed To Provide The Necessary Prisoner Trust Fund Account Information As Required By The Plra To Determine Whether The Inmate Is Entitled To Proceed Without Prepaying Fees And Costs. Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. Section 1915(b)(1), The Court Must Review The Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement For The 6 Month Period Immediately Preceding The Filing Of This Action. It Is Therefore Ordered That Plaintiff Shall Provide The Clerk Of Court With The Attached Certification Completed By The Trust Fund Officer At The Facility And A Copy Of His/her Trust Fund Account Statement (or Institutional Equivalent) For The Period 12/1/2019 To 6/24/2020 No Later Than 45 Days From The Date Of This Order. Failure To Do So Will Result In Dismissal Of This Action For Failure To Comply With An Order Of This Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See Generally Ladien V. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson V. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). The Clerk Is Directed To Mail A Copy Of This Order And The Certification Form To The Trust Fund Officer At Marion Usp. (trust Fund Statement Due On Or Before 8/10/2020). Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 6/25/2020. (tjk)'

Case number 3:20-cv-00610-JPG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

In Lanter Distributing LLC against Lazer Spot, Inc. : 'Complaint Against Lazer Spot, Inc. ( Filing Fee $ 400 Receipt Number 0754-4213249.), Filed By Lanter Distributing Llc. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-Trailer Interchange Agreement, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Summons Summons)(rembusch, Jill)'

Case number 3:20-cv-00619 was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

In Steven Webster against C / O Aushbrook, C / O Bridwel, C / O Givens, Deana Brokheart and Mat Bosecker:

'Complaint Against All Defendants, Filed By Steven Webster.(sag, Ilcd) [transferred From Illinois Central On 6/29/2020.]'

'Notice Of Case Opening. Please Be Advised That Your Case Has Been Assigned To Judge James Shadid. Effective Immediately, All Documents Should Be Mailed Or Scanned To The Peoria Division, 100 Ne Monroe Street, Peoria, Il 61602. Merit Review Deadline Set For 7/15/2020. (attachments: # 1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(sag, Ilcd) [transferred From Illinois Central On 6/29/2020.]'

'Petition To Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Filed By Steven Webster.(sag, Ilcd) [transferred From Illinois Central On 6/29/2020.]'

'Motion To Request Counsel By Plaintiff Steven Webster. Responses Due By 7/9/2020 (sag, Ilcd) [transferred From Illinois Central On 6/29/2020.]'

'Text Order Entered By Judge James E. Shadid On 6/25/2020. The Plaintiff, A State Prisoner, Has Submitted A Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant To 42 U.s.c. § 1983. 1 . Such Actions May Be Brought Only In (1) The Judicial District Where Any Defendant Resides (if All Defendants Reside In The Same State), (2) A Judicial District In Which A Substantial Part Of The Events Or Omissions Giving Rise To The Claim Occurred, Or (3) A Judicial District In Which Any Defendant May Be Found, If There Is No District In Which The Action May Otherwise Be Brought. See 28 U.s.c. § 1391(b). The Plaintiff's Claims Involve Defendants And Events At Lawrence Correctional Center In Lawrence County, Illinois, Which Is Situated In The Federal Judicial District For The Southern District Of Illinois. Therefore, The Court Finds Venue Over This Proceeding Lies In The Southern District Of Illinois, And It Is In The Interests Of Justice That This Cause Be Transferred There. See 28 U.s.c. § 1404(a). (sag, Ilcd) [transferred From Illinois Central On 6/29/2020.]'

Case number 3:20-cv-00632-SMY was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

More News