In Dunkley against Afscme: 'Sbcase Management Order. Consistent With Its Statements On The Record At The Final Pretrial Conference, The Court, In Order To Facilitate An Organized And Efficient Trial, Directs Each Party To Separately File Notices Of Witnesses On The Business Day Prior To The Day That Each Witness Will Be Called To Testify. The Court Further Directs The Parties To Schedule Their Witnesses For A Full Day Of Trial, 8:30 A.m. To 4:30 P.m., Erring On The Side Of Having More Witnesses Scheduled To Testify On A Particular Day Of Trial Than Fewer. In The Event That The Trial Day Ends Without A Particular Witness Or Witnesses Testifying, Then They Will Be Rescheduled For The Following Day, As Necessary. The Court Advises The Parties That It Expects A Seamless Transition Between Witnesses Without Unnecessary Delay. Each Anticipated Witness Should Be Present Outside The Courtroom At The Time He Or She Is Called To Testify. Any Delay Caused By A Party's Failure To Have A Witness Present Outside The Courtroom Should Be Avoided. The Failure To Have A Particular Witness Present Outside The Courtroom Could Result In The Court Requiring The Party To Move To Its Next Witness. Signed By Judge David W. Dugan On 4/25/2023. (jnh)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed. (entered: 04/25/2023)'
Case number 3:18-cv-02189-DWD was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.