In USA against Brandon M. Stofel and Monica L. Stofel:
'Complaint Against Brandon M. Stoffel, Monica L. Stoffel, Filed By Usa. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit A Through D, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(hanna, Adam)'
'Notice Of Foreclosure By Usa (hanna, Adam)'
'Notice Of Appearance By Adam E. Hanna On Behalf Of Usa (hanna, Adam)'
Case number 3:21-cv-00168 was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In USA against City of Olney, Illinois, David Banks, Estate of Kathryn L. Banks, Non-Record Claimants, Unknown Heirs and Legatees of Kathryn L. Banks and Unknown Owners:
'Complaint Against David Banks, City Of Olney, Illinois, Estate Of Kathryn L. Banks, Non-Record Claimants, Unknown Heirs And Legatees Of Kathryn L. Banks, Unknown Owners, Filed By Usa. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit A Through D, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(hanna, Adam)'
'Notice Of Foreclosure By Usa (hanna, Adam)'
'Notice Of Appearance By Adam E. Hanna On Behalf Of Usa (hanna, Adam)'
'Notice Of Judge Assignment. Judge David W. Dugan Assigned. All Future Documents Must Bear Case Number 21-171-dwd. Refer To Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, Found On The Ilsd Website, For Further Service Information. (trb)'
Case number 3:21-cv-00171-DWD was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Rico Clark against Hinton, J. B. Pritzker, John Doe 1, Rob Jefreys, Warden Wilis and Wexford Health Sources, Inc.:
'Memorandum And Order Severing Case Number 20-1133-spm. Signed By Judge Stephen P. McGlynn On2/9/2021. (tjk)'
'Complaint Against All Defendants, Filed By Rico Clark.(tjk)'
'Motion For Preliminary Injunction By Rico Clark. (tjk)'
'Merit Review Order. Signed By Judge Stephen P. McGlynn On11/2/2020. (tjk)'
'Response In Opposition Re 3 Motion For Preliminary Injunction Filed By Hinton, Rob Jeffreys, Warden Willis. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(tjk)'
'Response In Opposition Re 3 Motion For Preliminary Injunction Filed By Wexford Health Sources, Inc.. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(tjk)'
'Answer To 2 Complaint By Wexford Health Sources, Inc..(tjk)'
'Notice Of Severed Case Opening: On February 11, 2021, This Case Was Severed From Fleming V. Pritzker, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 20-cv-1133-spm. Your Case Name And Number Is Clark V. Pritzker, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 21-cv-153-Spm. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Clark To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Clark On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (tjk)'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Pritzker, Jeffreys, Willis, Wexford, And Hinton To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Pritzker, Jeffreys, Willis, Wexford, And Hinton On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (tjk)'
Case number 3:21-cv-00153-SPM was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Shelby Turner against Hinton, J. B. Pritzker, John Doe 1, Rob Jefreys, Warden Wilis and Wexford Health Sources, Inc.:
'Memorandum And Order Severing Case Number 20-1133-spm. Signed By Judge Stephen P. McGlynn On2/9/2021. (tjk)'
'Complaint Against All Defendants, Filed By Shelby Turner.(tjk)'
'Motion For Preliminary Injunction By Shelby Turner. (tjk)'
'Merit Review Order. Signed By Judge Stephen P. McGlynn On11/2/2020. (tjk)'
'Response In Opposition Re 3 Motion For Preliminary Injunction Filed By Hinton, Rob Jeffreys, Warden Willis. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(tjk)'
'Response In Opposition Re 3 Motion For Preliminary Injunction Filed By Wexford Health Sources, Inc.. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(tjk)'
'Answer To 2 Complaint By Wexford Health Sources, Inc..(tjk)'
'Notice Of Severed Case Opening: On February 11, 2021, This Case Was Severed From Fleming V. Pritzker, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 20-cv-1133-spm. Your Case Name And Number Is Turner V. Pritzker, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 21-cv-154-Spm. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Turner To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Turner On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (tjk)'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Pritzker, Jeffreys, Willis, Wexford, And Hinton To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Pritzker, Jeffreys, Willis, Wexford, And Hinton On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (tjk)'
Case number 3:21-cv-00154-SPM was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Dartaniel Pruit against John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and Rich Stevenson:
'Complaint Against All Defendants Filed By Dartaniel Pruitt.(kare)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Dartaniel Pruitt. (kare)'
'Notice And Order: The Court Has Received Your Complaint And Your Motion To Proceed Without Prepayment Of The Filing Fee. Your Case Number Is 21-167-jpg. The Following Is Some Information You Should Know Regarding The Initial Stages Of Your Lawsuit. After Your Filing Fee Status Is Determined, The Court Will Review Your Complaint To Identify Legally Sufficient Claims And Defendants And Dismiss Any Legally Insufficient Claims. See: 28 U.s.c. Sec. 1915a. The Court Will Conduct This Review Within The Next 60 Days And Inform You Of The Findings In A Merit Review Order. No Other Action Will Be Taken In Your Case During This Time, Absent Extraordinary Circumstances. Therefore, You Do Not Need To Submit Any Evidence, Argument, Motions, Or Other Documents. If You Filed A Motion For Recruitment Of Counsel Along With Your Complaint, It Will Not Be Considered Until The Merit Review Is Complete. Please Note That Any Motion For Recruitment Of Counsel Must Include Evidence Of Your Own Efforts To Find Counsel, Such As A List Of The Attorneys You Contacted And Copies Of Letters You Sent Or Received. See Pruitt V. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If You Do Not Receive A Merit Review Order Within The Next 60 Days, You May File A Motion Requesting The Status Of Your Case. In The Event Your Claim(s) Survive The Merit Review, Further Information And Instruction Will Be Provided To You At That Time. In Addition, Several Administrative Matters Warrant Mention. Any Communication Directed To The Court Should Be In The Form Of A Motion Or Other Pleading And Not A Letter. All Mail Should Be Sent To: Clerk's Office, U.s. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Il 62201. Finally, You Are Advised That If Your Address Changes, You Must Notify The Court Within Seven Days Of The Change By Filing A Notice Of Change Of Address. Failure To Do So Could Result In The Dismissal Of Your Case.. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (kare)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Plaintiff To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Plaintiff On 02/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (kare)'
Case number 3:21-cv-00167-JPG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In George Ganon against Dr. David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group:
'Memorandum And Order Severing Case Number 21-138-jpg. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)'
'Complaint Against David Marcowitz, Trinity Service Group, Richard Watson, Filed By George Gannon. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Declarations)(tjk)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By George Gannon. (tjk)'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Gannon To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Gannon On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (tjk)'
'Order: On February 11, 2021, This Case Was Severed From Brown V. Watson, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 21-cv-138-jpg. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay A $402.00 Filing Fee In This Case In This Case ($350.00 If He Is Granted Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis). Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until March 18, 2021 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. (action Due By 3/18/2021). Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:21-cv-00169-JPG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Joey Thomas against Dr. David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group:
'Memorandum And Order Severing Case Number 21-138-jpg. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)'
'Complaint Against David Marcowitz, Trinity Service Group, Richard Watson, Filed By Joey Thomas. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Declarations)(tjk)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Joey Thomas. (tjk)'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Thomas To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Thomas On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (tjk)'
'Order: On February 11, 2021, This Case Was Severed From Brown V. Watson, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 21-cv-138-jpg. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay A $402.00 Filing Fee In This Case In This Case ($350.00 If He Is Granted Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis). Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until March 18, 2021 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. (action Due By 3/18/2021). Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:21-cv-00162-JPG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In John Eglseder against David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group:
'Order Severing Case. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/10/2021. (jaj)'
'Complaint Against All Defendants Filed By John Eglseder.(jaj)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By John Eglseder. (jaj)'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Plaintiff To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Plaintiff On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (jaj)'
'Order: On February 11, 2021, This Case Was Severed From Brown V. Watson, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 21-cv-138-jpg. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay A $402.00 Filing Fee In This Case In This Case ($350.00 If He Is Granted Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis). Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until March 18, 2021 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:21-cv-00159-JPG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Kevin McCreight against David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group:
'Order Severing Case. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/10/2021. (jaj)'
'Complaint Against All Defendants Filed By Kevin McCreight.(jaj)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Kevin McCreight. (jaj)'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Plaintiff To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Plaintiff On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (jaj)'
'Order: On February 11, 2021, This Case Was Severed From Brown V. Watson, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 21-cv-138-jpg. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay A $402.00 Filing Fee In This Case In This Case ($350.00 If He Is Granted Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis). Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until March 18, 2021 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. (action Due By 3/18/2021). Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:21-cv-00151-JPG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Cedric D. Alen against David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group:
'Order Severing Case. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/10/2021. (jaj)'
'Complaint Against All Defendants Filed By Cedric D. Allen.(jaj)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Cedric D. Allen. (jaj)'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Plaintiff To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Plaintiff On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (jaj)'
'Order: On February 11, 2021, This Case Was Severed From Brown V. Watson, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 21-cv-138-jpg. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay A $402.00 Filing Fee In This Case In This Case ($350.00 If He Is Granted Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis). Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until March 18, 2021 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:21-cv-00156-JPG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Ray Taylor against Dr. David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group:
'Memorandum And Order Severing Case Number 21-138-jpg. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)'
'Complaint Against All Defendants, Filed By Ray Taylor. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Declarations)(tjk)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Ray Taylor. (tjk)'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Taylor To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Taylor On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (tjk)'
'Order: On February 11, 2021, This Case Was Severed From Brown V. Watson, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 21-cv-138-jpg. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay A $402.00 Filing Fee In This Case In This Case ($350.00 If He Is Granted Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis). Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until March 18, 2021 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. (action Due By 3/18/2021). Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:21-cv-00163-JPG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Trevon Fenton against Dr. David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group:
'Memorandum And Order Severing Case Number 21-138-jpg. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)'
'Complaint Against All Defendants, Filed By Trevon Fenton. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Declaration)(tjk)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Trevon Fenton. (tjk)'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Fenton To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Fenton On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (tjk)'
'Order: On February 11, 2021, This Case Was Severed From Brown V. Watson, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 21-cv-138-jpg. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay A $402.00 Filing Fee In This Case In This Case ($350.00 If He Is Granted Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis). Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until March 18, 2021 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. (action Due By 3/18/2021). Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:21-cv-00165-JPG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Keandre Holins against Dr. David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group:
'Memorandum And Order Severing Case Number 21-138-jpg. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)'
'Complaint Against David Marcowitz, Trinity Service Group, Richard Watson, Filed By Keandre Hollins. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Declarations)(tjk)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Keandre Hollins. (tjk)'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Hollins To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Hollins On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (tjk)'
'Order: On February 11, 2021, This Case Was Severed From Brown V. Watson, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 21-cv-138-jpg. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay A $402.00 Filing Fee In This Case In This Case ($350.00 If He Is Granted Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis). Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until March 18, 2021 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. (action Due By 3/18/2021). Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:21-cv-00161-JPG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Andrew McKisick against Dr. David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group:
'Memorandum And Order Severing Case Number 21-138-jpg. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)'
'Complaint Against David Marcowitz, Trinity Service Group, Richard Watson, Filed By Andrew McKissick. (attachments: #1 Exhibit, # 2 Declarations)(tjk)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Andrew McKissick. (tjk)'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing McKissick To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No.257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Mckissick On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (tjk)'
'Order: On February 11, 2021, This Case Was Severed From Brown V. Watson, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 21-cv-138-jpg. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay A $402.00 Filing Fee In This Case In This Case ($350.00 If He Is Granted Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis). Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until March 18, 2021 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:21-cv-00160-JPG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Arenzo Hofman against David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group:
'Order Severing Case. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/10/2021. (jaj)'
'Complaint Against All Defendants Filed By Arenzo Hoffman.(jaj)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Arenzo Hoffman. (jaj)'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Plaintiff To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Plaintiff On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (jaj)'
'Order: On February 11, 2021, This Case Was Severed From Brown V. Watson, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 21-cv-138-jpg. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay A $402.00 Filing Fee In This Case In This Case ($350.00 If He Is Granted Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis). Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until March 18, 2021 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. (action Due By 3/18/2021). Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:21-cv-00164-JPG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Joseph Nickel against David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trivity Service Group:
'Order Severing Case. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/10/2021. (jaj)'
'Complaint Against All Defendants Filed By Joseph Nickell.(jaj)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Joseph Nickell. (jaj)'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Plaintiff To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Plaintiff On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (jaj)'
'Order: On February 11, 2021, This Case Was Severed From Brown V. Watson, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 21-cv-138-jpg. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay A $402.00 Filing Fee In This Case In This Case ($350.00 If He Is Granted Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis). Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until March 18, 2021 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. (action Due By 3/18/2021). Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:21-cv-00157-JPG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Andrew Kunkle against David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group:
'Order Severing Case. Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/10/2021. (jaj)'
'Complaint Against All Defendants Filed By Andrew Kunkle.(jaj)'
'Notice From Clerk Instructing Plaintiff To File Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257, Within 21 Days Of This Notice, You Must File The Attached Form Indicating Your Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent. Consent/non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Sent To Plaintiff On 2/11/2021. Consent Due By 3/4/2021 (jaj)'
'Order: On February 11, 2021, This Case Was Severed From Brown V. Watson, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 21-cv-138-jpg. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay A $402.00 Filing Fee In This Case In This Case ($350.00 If He Is Granted Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis). Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until March 18, 2021 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. (action Due By 3/18/2021). Signed By Judge J. Phil Gilbert On 2/11/2021. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:21-cv-00155-JPG was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Rana Schmidt against John D Lakin, Kathy L Nodine and Madison County Illinois: 'Complaint And Jury Demand Against All Defendants ( Filing Fee $ 402 Receipt Number 0754-4400426.), Filed By All Plaintiffs. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(tapella, William)'
Case number 3:21-cv-00152 was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Daren Duncan against BASF Corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Bayer CropScience, Inc. , CHS Inc. , Cargill Incorporated, Corteva Inc. , Federated Co - Operatives Ltd. , Growmark Inc. , Nutrien AG Solutions Inc. , Simplot AB Retail Sub, Inc. , Syngenta Corporation, Tenkoz Inc. , Univar Solutions, Inc. and Winfield Solutions, LLC:
'Complaint Against Basf Corporation, Bayer Cropscience Lp, Bayer Cropscience, Inc., Chs Inc., Cargill Incorporated, Corteva Inc., Federated Co-operatives Ltd., Growmark Inc., Nutrien Ag Solutions Inc., Simplot Ab Retail Sub, Inc., Syngenta Corporation, Tenkoz Inc., Univar Solutions, Inc., Winfield Solutions, Llc ( Filing Fee $ 402 Receipt Number 0754-4400749.), Filed By Darren Duncan. (attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons, # 5 Summons, # 6 Summons, # 7 Summons, # 8 Summons, # 9 Summons, # 10 Summons, # 11 Summons, # 12 Summons, # 13 Summons, # 14 Summons, # 15 Summons, # 16 Summons)(brandt, Derek)'
'Notice Of Appearance By Derek Y. Brandt On Behalf Of Darren Duncan (brandt, Derek)'
'Notice Of Appearance By Leigh M. Perica On Behalf Of Darren Duncan (perica, Leigh)'
'Notice Of Appearance By Connor P. Lemire On Behalf Of Darren Duncan (lemire, Connor)'
Case number 3:21-cv-00158 was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.