Quantcast

MADISON - ST. CLAIR RECORD

Sunday, May 5, 2024

Case activity for Jirushaya Hogan vs Stanford Galion on Oct. 2

Filings
General court 10

shutterstock.com

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois reported the following activities in the suit brought by Jirushaya Hogan against Groendyke Transport, Inc. and Stanford Galion on Oct. 2.

'Notice Of Removal From Madison County Cirtcuit Court, Case Number 2020l-001240 ( Filing Fee $ 400 Receipt Number 0754-4296288), Filed By Groendyke Transport Inc. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(perryman, Ted)'

'Notice Of Appearance By Ted L. Perryman On Behalf Of Groendyke Transport Inc (perryman, Ted)'

'Notice Of Appearance By Korissa M. Zickrick On Behalf Of Groendyke Transport Inc (zickrick, Korissa)'

'Notice Of Appearance By Rachel L. Capel On Behalf Of Groendyke Transport Inc (capel, Rachel)'

'Demand For Trial By Jury By Groendyke Transport Inc. (perryman, Ted)'

'Notice By Groendyke Transport Inc To Plaintiff Of Removal (perryman, Ted)'

'Stipulation For Removal By Groendyke Transport Inc. (perryman, Ted)'

'Answer To Complaint By Groendyke Transport Inc.(perryman, Ted)'

'Notice Of Appearance By Ted L. Perryman On Behalf Of Stanford Gallion (perryman, Ted)'

'Notice Of Appearance By Korissa M. Zickrick On Behalf Of Stanford Gallion (zickrick, Korissa)'

'Notice Of Appearance By Rachel L. Capel On Behalf Of Stanford Gallion (capel, Rachel)'

'Answer To Complaint By Stanford Gallion.(perryman, Ted)'

'Notice Of Initial Assignment To A U.s. Magistrate Judge: This Case Has Been Randomly Assigned To United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257. The Parties Are Advised That Their Consent Is Required If The Assigned Magistrate Judge Is To Conduct All Further Proceedings In The Case, Including Trial And Final Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 636(c) And Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 73. As Set Forth In Administrative Order No. 257, Each Party Will Be Required To File A Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Indicating Consent Or Nonconsent To The Jurisdiction Of The Assigned Magistrate Judge. If All Parties Do Not Consent To The Magistrate Judge's Jurisdiction, The Case Will Be Randomly Assigned To A District Judge For All Further Proceedings And The Parties Cannot Later Consent To Reassignment Of The Case To A Magistrate Judge. The Parties Are Further Advised That They Are Free To Withhold Consent Without Adverse Substantive Consequences. Within 21 Days Of This Notice, The Following Party Or Parties Must File The Attached Form Indicating Consent To Proceed Before The Assigned Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent: Stanford Gallion, Groendyke Transport, Inc., Jirushaya Hogan. A Link Regarding The Magistrate Judges In This District Is Attached For Your Convenience: Http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/benefitsofconsent.pdf. All Future Documents Must Bear Case Number 3:20-cv-1043-rjd. Refer To Civil/removal Case Processing Requirements, Found On The Ilsd Website, For Further Service Information. Consent Due By 10/23/2020 (kls3)'

'Consent/Non-consent To U.s. Magistrate Judge-sealed Pending Receipt From All Parties. (perryman, Ted)'

Case number 3:20-cv-01043-RJD was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois on Oct. 2.

More News