Quantcast

Case activity for Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company vs Pap-R Products Company on Aug. 31

MADISON - ST. CLAIR RECORD

Sunday, November 24, 2024

Case activity for Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company vs Pap-R Products Company on Aug. 31

Filings
General court 10

shutterstock.com

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois reported the following activities in the suit brought by Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company against K. Scot Ware, Pap - R - Tainer LLC, Pap-R Products Company, The Coin - Tainer Company, LLC and studio503, LLC on Aug. 31.

'Complaint For Declaratory Judgment Against All Defendants ( Filing Fee $ 400 Receipt Number 0754-4269129.), Filed By Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R Part 1, # 19 Exhibit R Part 2, # 20 Exhibit S, # 21 Exhibit T, # 22 Exhibit U, # 23 Civil Cover Sheet)(valentino, Richard)'

'Notice Of Appearance By Richard T. Valentino On Behalf Of Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company (valentino, Richard)'

'Corporate Disclosure Statement By Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company. (valentino, Richard)'

'Summons Requested. (valentino, Richard)'

'Notice Of Initial Assignment To A U.s. Magistrate Judge: This Case Has Been Randomly Assigned To United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty Pursuant To Administrative Order No. 257. The Parties Are Advised That Their Consent Is Required If The Assigned Magistrate Judge Is To Conduct All Further Proceedings In The Case, Including Trial And Final Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 636(c) And Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 73. As Set Forth In Administrative Order No. 257, Each Party Will Be Required To File A Notice And Consent To Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form Indicating Consent Or Nonconsent To The Jurisdiction Of The Assigned Magistrate Judge. If All Parties Do Not Consent To The Magistrate Judge's Jurisdiction, The Case Will Be Randomly Assigned To A District Judge For All Further Proceedings And The Parties Cannot Later Consent To Reassignment Of The Case To A Magistrate Judge. The Parties Are Further Advised That They Are Free To Withhold Consent Without Adverse Substantive Consequences. Within 21 Days Of This Notice, The Following Party Or Parties Must File The Attached Form Indicating Consent To Proceed Before The Assigned Magistrate Judge Or An Affirmative Declination To Consent: Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company. A Link Regarding The Magistrate Judges In This District Is Attached For Your Convenience: Http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/benefitsofconsent.pdf. All Future Documents Must Bear Case Number 20-874-mab. Consent Due By 9/21/2020 (amv)'

Case number 3:20-cv-00874-MAB was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois on Aug. 31.

More News