In Peter Gakuba against Angela Mize, Catherine Wright and Karen Panier:
'Memorandum And Order Severing Case Number 19-1081-smy. Signed By Judge Staci M. Yandle On 11/18/2019. (jaj)'
'Complaint Against All Defendants Filed By Peter Gakuba.(jaj)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Peter Gakuba. (jaj)'
'Motion For Recruitment Of Counsel By Peter Gakuba. (jaj)'
'Order: On November 19, 2019, This Case Was Severed From Gakuba V. Swells, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 19-cv-1081-smy. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay An Additional $350.00 Filing Fee In This Case. Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until December 26, 2019 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. (action Due By 12/26/2019). Signed By Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel On 11/19/2019. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:19-cv-01274-NJR was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Peter Gakuba against Mr. Henderson:
'Memorandum And Order Severing Case Number 19-1081-smy. Signed By Judge Staci M. Yandle On 11/18/2019. (jaj)'
'Complaint Against Mr. Henderson Filed By Peter Gakuba.(jaj)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Peter Gakuba. (jaj)'
'Motion For Recruitment Of Counsel By Peter Gakuba. (jaj)'
'Motion For Equitable Relief: Tro, Premliminary And Permanent Inuunction, Declaraty Judgment By Peter Gakuba. (jaj)'
'Order: On November 19, 2019, This Case Was Severed From Gakuba V. Swells, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 19-cv-1081-smy. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay An Additional $350.00 Filing Fee In This Case. Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until December 26, 2019 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. (action Due By 12/26/2019). Signed By Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel On 11/19/2019. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:19-cv-01273-NJR was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Peter Gakuba against April Wampler, Arede Johnson, Dr. Shah, Litle John, Michele Nese and Ms. Helregel:
'Memorandum And Order Severing Case Number 19-1081-smy. Signed By Judge Staci M. Yandle On 11/18/2019. (tjk)'
'Complaint Against Ms. Helregel, Arede Johnson, Little John, Michelle Neese, Dr. Shah, April Wampler, Filed By Peter Gakuba.(tjk)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Peter Gakuba. (tjk)'
'Motion For Recruitment Of Counsel By Peter Gakuba. (tjk)'
'Order: On November 19, 2019, This Case Was Severed From Gakuba V. Swells, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 19-cv-1081-smy. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay An Additional $350.00 Filing Fee In This Case. Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until December 26, 2019 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. (action Due By 12/26/2019). Signed By Judge Staci M. Yandle On 11/19/2019. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:19-cv-01272-SMY was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Johny A Corbin against Tyson Foods, Inc. :
'Complaint Against Tyson Foods, Inc. ( Filing Fee $ 400 Receipt Number 0754-4030840.), Filed By Johnny A Corbin. (attachments: # 1 Exhibit Notice Of Right To Sue, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Summons)(furniss, Ryan)'
'Notice Of Appearance By Ryan M. Furniss On Behalf Of Johnny A Corbin (furniss, Ryan)'
Case number 3:19-cv-01275 was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Mwamba M. Rufin against Dr. Ritz, Faiyaz Ahmed, John Baldwin, Vipin K. Shah and Wexford Health Sources, Inc.:
'Memorandum And Order Severing Case Number 19-896-smy. Signed By Judge Staci M. Yandle On 11/18/2019. (tjk)'
'Complaint Against Faiyaz Ahmed, John Baldwin, Dr. Ritz, Vipin K. Shah, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Filed By Mwamba M. Ruffin.(tjk)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Mwamba M. Ruffin. (tjk)'
'Motion For Recruitment Of Counsel By Mwamba M. Ruffin. (tjk)'
'Order: On November 19, 2019, This Case Was Severed From Ruffin V. Trotter, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 19-cv-896-smy. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay An Additional $350.00 Filing Fee In This Case. Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until December 26, 2019 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. (action Due By 12/26/2019). Signed By Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel On 11/19/2019. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:19-cv-01270-NJR was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
In Mwamba M. Rufin against Lorie Cunningham:
'Memorandum And Order Severing Case Number 19-896-smy. Signed By Judge Staci M. Yandle On 11/18/2019. (tjk)'
'Complaint Against Lorie Cunningham, Filed By Mwamba M. Ruffin.(tjk)'
'Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis By Mwamba M. Ruffin. (tjk)'
'Motion For Recruitment Of Counsel By Mwamba M. Ruffin. (tjk)'
'Order: On November 19, 2019, This Case Was Severed From Ruffin V. Trotter, Et Al, Sdil Case No. 19-cv-896-smy. Plaintiff Should Be Aware Of The Consequences Of Proceeding With This Action. First, The Court Will Screen The Action Pursuant To 28 U.s.c. 1915a, And Plaintiff Will Incur A Strike Within The Meaning Of Section 1915(g) If The Court Determines That The Action Is Frivolous Or Malicious, Fails To State A Claim On Which Relief May Be Granted, Or Seeks Monetary Relief Against A Defendant Who Is Immune From Such Relief. Second, Plaintiff Will Be Required To Pay An Additional $350.00 Filing Fee In This Case. Of Course, Plaintiff Can Also Opt Not To Proceed With This Action By Voluntarily Dismissing It, Thereby Avoiding The Risk Of A Strike And The Financial Burden Of An Additional Filing Fee. Plaintiff Should Carefully Consider These Points, Along With The Merits And Relative Importance Of This Lawsuit, In Deciding Whether To Proceed With It. Plaintiff Shall Have Until December 26, 2019 To Advise The Court In Writing Whether He Wishes To Proceed With This Lawsuit. If He Chooses To Go Forward, The Court Will Assess An Initial Partial Filing Fee (if Appropriate) And Screen The Complaint. On The Other Hand, If Plaintiff Opts To Voluntarily Dismiss The Case By The Deadline, He Will Not Have To Pay A Filing Fee, The Court Will Not Screen The Complaint, And The Case Will Be Dismissed Without Prejudice. Plaintiff Is Warned That If He Fails To Respond To This Order By The Deadline, He Will Be Obligated To Pay The Full Filing Fee And This Action Will Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution And/or For Failure To Comply With A Court Order. (action Due By 12/26/2019). Signed By Judge Staci M. Yandle On 11/19/2019. (tjk)this Text Entry Is An Order Of The Court. No Further Documentation Will Be Mailed.'
Case number 3:19-cv-01271-SMY was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.