Quantcast

Medical malpractice suit at trial in Stobbs’ court

MADISON - ST. CLAIR RECORD

Sunday, December 22, 2024

Medical malpractice suit at trial in Stobbs’ court

Lawsuits
Shutterstock 107827985

A medical malpractice suit alleging a woman’s bladder was lacerated during a laproscopy procedure is at trial in Madison County Associate Judge Stobbs’ courtroom.

The case had previously been assigned to Circuit Judge Andreas Matoesian, who has been on leave for unspecified reasons since Labor Day. The case was officially reassigned to Stobbs on Dec. 3, 2018.

Stobbs also presides over the asbestos docket, which has thousands of cases pending.

Plaintiffs Tonya and Steven Monroe are represented by Keith Short and Jack Daugherty of Short & Daugherty PC in Alton.

Defendant St. Anthony’s Health Center is represented by Jeffrey Glass and Madelyn Lamb of Hinshaw & Culbertson

Defendants Dr. Sara Cannon and Illini Medical Associates are represented by Timothy Richards and Adam Braundmeier of Neville Richards & Wuller in Belleville.

The Monroes filed their four-count complaint on April 28, 2011 against Cannon, St. Anthony’s Health Center and Illini Medical Associates.

They later filed a third amended complaint on July 17, 2017.

According to the complaint, Tonya Monroe alleges she was admitted to St. Anthony’s Health Center in Alton on May 1, 2009 due to pelvic pain. She alleges Cannon performed a diagnostic lacroscopy, lysis of adhesions and cauterization of endometriosis implants.

Monroe was postoperatively diagnosed with pelvic pain, pelvic adhesions and endometriosis. 

However, Monroe claims she was previously diagnosed with ovarian syndrome in 2002, birthed a child via cesarean section in 2006 and had her gallbladder removed, causing her “to be vulnerable to substantially increased risk of surgical injury.”

Following the May 2009 procedures, Monroe claims her bladder was lacerated, torn, damaged, devascularized and otherwise compromised. She alleges Cannon took no steps to test the integrity of her bladder.

During recovery, Monroe complained of pain and nausea. She also complained that she could not urinate and required more than one catheterization.

Cannon allegedly ordered fluids to be infused in the plaintiff at 150 milliliters per hour. However, Monroe claims the nurses at St. Anthony’s infused fluids at a rate of 300 milliliters per hour, causing her bladder to inflate to a capacity beyond that of a normal human bladder capacity. As a result, Monroe’s bladder allegedly leaked urine into her pelvic cavity, abdomen and body, causing infection, tissue damage, pain and disfigurement.

Monroe had to undergo additional surgeries to correct the damage.

The plaintiff claims Cannon’s decision to operate on her bladder adhesion was a deviation from the standard of care as she did not complain of any urinary symptoms.

Monroe alleges the defendants failed to warn her of her increased risk of bladder lacerations, failed to test the integrity of her bladder following the procedure, failed to timely diagnose the bladder laceration, negligently caused too much fluid to be infused and failed to adequately chart their care of the plaintiff.

As a result, Monroe claims she has suffered permanent disfigurement, will continue to suffer loss of a normal life, will never again be able to give birth and will continue to be prevented from a normal, intimate sexual relationship with her husband. She also claims she suffers from severe emotional and mental anguish, will continue to lose income and will require necessary future medical treatment.

The plaintiff also alleges she has a restricted number of physicians willing to accept her as a patient because she is now considered high-risk.

On Jan. 9, St. Anthony’s Health Center filed a motion to strike certain matters from the third amended complaint. The defendant argues there is no actual or apparent agency between Cannon and the hospital.

According to a statement of the case filed Jan. 10, the defendants deny they were negligent, deny any claimed act or omission on their part was the proximate cause of any of the alleged damages and deny that the plaintiffs sustained damages to the extend alleged.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 11-L-403

More News