Quantcast

Preckwinkle suing soda tax opponents, judge fears 'chilling effect'

MADISON - ST. CLAIR RECORD

Friday, November 22, 2024

Preckwinkle suing soda tax opponents, judge fears 'chilling effect'

Their View
Law money 01

Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle is seeking $17 million in damages from the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, or IRMA, according to Crain’s Chicago Business.

IRMA has challenged the Cook County soda tax multiple times. Shortly before the tax was supposed to take effect July 1, IRMA filed a lawsuit against Cook County, arguingthe soda tax was unconstitutionally vague.

An appellate court upheld a temporary restraining order on the soda tax, which lasted almost a month. During this period, a Preckwinkle spokesperson told Crain’s that the county suffered more $20 million in financial damages.

On July 28, Cook County Circuit Court Judge Daniel Kubasiak upheld the soda tax. On Aug. 1, IRMA announced it was appealing the decision, but the tax still went into effect Aug. 2.

IRMA stated it would “exercise [its] rights” and continue with the appeal.

Kubasiak expressed concern about the precedent Cook County was willing to set. “I could find no such case of a governmental body suing a taxpayer who had challenged a tax,” he said according to Crain’s.

“I can tell you that I am troubled by this, the chilling effect of the government saying that you best not challenge us because if you are proven wrong, we will come and get damages from you.”

The new soda tax will be added on top of Chicago’s combined sales tax of 10.25 percent and the city’s 3 percent beverage tax. With the new sugary beverage tax, soda in Chicago will be some of the most expensive in the nation as a $4 12-pack of soda will cost $5.97, an effective tax rate of nearly 50 percent.y Board President Toni Preckwinkle is seeking $17 million in damages from the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, or IRMA, according to Crain’s Chicago Business.

IRMA has challenged the Cook County soda tax multiple times. Shortly before the tax was supposed to take effect July 1, IRMA filed a lawsuit against Cook County, arguingthe soda tax was unconstitutionally vague.

An appellate court upheld a temporary restraining order on the soda tax, which lasted almost a month. During this period, a Preckwinkle spokesperson told Crain’s that the county suffered more $20 million in financial damages.

On July 28, Cook County Circuit Court Judge Daniel Kubasiak upheld the soda tax. On Aug. 1,IRMA announced it was appealing the decision, but the tax still went into effectAug. 2.

IRMA stated it would “exercise [its] rights” and continue with the appeal.

Kubasiak expressed concern about the precedent Cook County was willing to set. “I could find no such case of a governmental body suing a taxpayer who had challenged a tax,” he said according to Crain’s.

“I can tell you that I am troubled by this, the chilling effect of the government saying that you best not challenge us because if you are proven wrong, we will come and get damages from you.”

The new soda tax will be added on top of Chicago’s  combined sales tax of 10.25 percent and the city’s 3 percent beverage tax. With the new sugary beverage tax, soda in Chicago will be some of the most expensive in the nation as a $4 12-pack of soda will cost $5.97, an effective tax rate of nearly 50 percent.

chicago soda tax

The new tax on sugary beverages will also affect fountain drinks, energy drinks, bottled tea and coffee products, diet soda and juices that aren’t 100 percent fruit or vegetable juice.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News